Criteria
 |
Load
Time - Nominated web sites will be timed for
total page load time from 14,400,
28,800,
and 56K modem access. Understanding that load times can be influenced by
many
factors such as ISP access congestion these timings will be conducted over
5 to
7
days including weekends and at different times of the day and night. The
results will be
reviewed
and graded on a point scale.
Design
Layout
- Sites will be reviewed for excessive
use of text only, picture or icon image
displacement
or excessive use, excessive banner display, aesthetic value, custom layout
structure,
unified design flow and HTML, consistency, and the use and the application
of
custom
forms and image maps or other custom features.
Color
-
Grading will consider lack of color or poor color coordination, gray scale
backgrounds
with
difficult text contrast, flat palette and dimension loss, unique color
options, unique
background
color, unique button color, custom logo applications of color, professional
matching
of color, depth, artistic value, and resolution as will be reviewed under
256K and
24M
color settings.
Navigation
-
Focus will be on nonfunctional, difficult, or confusing areas and keys
of site
navigation.
Aspects such as poor button design or location, text only navigation, coordinated
sidebar
text, overhead bars, custom buttons or bars, site search fields, highlighted
buttons
or
bars, reflection of previous use, custom image maps, and placement and
access of
navigational
tools.
Quality
-
Site review of stale or outdated content, poor quality icons, dead links,
lack of
email
or other facilities, piecing together, page structure, form and borders,
banner display
form,
online services or custom services, timing of material updates, degree
of useful
content,
line or data wraps,and all sites will be reviewed in both Microsoft Internet
Explorer
and
Netscape.
Completion
-
Review for missing icons or pictures, dead links, excessive errors, construction
signs,
lack of "alt" messages on images, and any form of apparent or implied lack
of finality
in
the best possible current format.
Content
-
Site grading for excessive banner use, loops, pop-ups, poor ad placement
or
display,
dead links, excessive sales pitch only, excessive use of warn messages,
updated
archives,
overall use with access to search engines, software, news, or other user
friendly
applications
from the site, chat access, forums, and other useful information, web design
tools
access, art, multimedia, custom applications and software, and consistency
of content.
Originality
-
Judging on the lack of original content or cookie cutter use of generic
design
features,
personal touch and application, custom logos and backgrounds, custom design
features,
unique design features, unique feature presentation or combination, custom
online
services,
artistic expression, use and application of art, design, or multimedia.
Innovation
-
Review of individuality, unique application of original design or features,
the
unique
application of art or multimedia, personality aspects, language barrier
applications,
use
of image maps or java style resources,and specific interactive features
unique to the
individual
web site.
Hit
Draw - Popularity is certainly a keen concern
of most webmasters. However, in fairness
of
accurate review the draw of public hits to the site must be tempered. A
sliding scale of
hit
count will be applied where small personal sites that exhibit a high degree
of expertise
or
site review grading in the above specific areas will not be severely penalized
for a low hit
count.
A lower maximum has been applied to this scale based on average site count
so
that
all reviewed sites can and will grade. Sites with high hit count will score
on the upper
end
of this scale, but are still subject to the criteria of the above areas.
Scaled as follows:
Hits/Per
Day 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 and above
 |